MUST FAITH ENDURE FOR SALVATION TO BE SURE? (Pt. 5)
by Tom Stegall
Must
your faith endure and your life be spiritually fruitful in order for your
eternal salvation to be sure? Does God
require "faithfulness" toward Christ or simple "faith" in
Christ to be eternally saved? This
current series has examined these questions in the light of the Bible's
teaching. The following article will
examine more passages which address the question of whether the child of God
must persevere in faith and holiness to the end of his or her earthly life to
be guaranteed everlasting life, as is required by the traditional Calvinistic
doctrine of the "Perseverance of the Saints."
The Bible
actually teaches that it is possible for one who has been genuinely saved to …
1) …commit idolatry and apostasy.
(1 Kgs 11:1-10)
2) …believe only for a while.
(Luke 8:13)
3) …not continue in the Word of
Christ. (Jn. 8:31)
4) …not
abide in Christ. (John 15:1-8)
"I am the true
vine, and my Father is the husbandman.
Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth
it, that it may bring forth more fruit.
Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch
cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye,
except ye abide in me. I am the vine,
ye are the branches: He that
abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me
ye can do nothing. If a man abide not
in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and
cast them into the fire, and
they are burned. If ye abide in me, and
my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto
you. Herein is my Father glorified,
that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples." (John
15:1-8)
This passage is similar to the discipleship passage of John
8:30-32. Here the emphasis is on
continuing in fellowship with Christ as the source of spiritual life which will
result in fruitfulness and evidence of being Christ's disciple. John 15:1-8 is yet another biblical passage
which shows that a genuinely redeemed child of God may not persevere in faith
and fellowship with Christ to the end of his or her earthly life.
Not surprisingly however, many commentators misunderstand Christ here to
be issuing a warning to this effect, "Bear fruit or perish
forever!" Some Arminian
commentators have misinterpreted Christ as saying that salvation can be lost
if Christians don't abide or stay connected with Christ. On the other hand, those of the Calvinistic
persuasion who do not believe salvation can be "lost" typically
interpret this passage as presenting a test of the reality of one's
faith in Christ. If your faith is genuine,
they say, it will be proven by a fruitful, persevering, or abiding faith. Their doctrine of the perseverance of the
saints seems to necessitate this interpretation.
J. Carl Laney represents this view.
He writes regarding John 15:1-6, "…the
fruitless branches represent disciples who have had an external association
with Christ that is not matched by an internal, spiritual union entered into by
personal faith and regeneration."[1] Laney continues, "The gospel of John also presents the reader with an enigma of
"belief" that is not belief.
In the progress of belief there is a stage that falls short of genuine
or consummated faith resulting in salvation (2:23-25; 7:31; 8:31, 40, 45-46;
12:11, 37). Tenney refers to the
"belief" that falls short of genuine faith as
"superficial." Morris calls
it "transitory belief" that is not saving faith. Many were inclined to believe something
about Jesus but were not willing to yield their allegiance to Him or trust Him
as their personal sin-bearer."[2]
But do the branches in John 15:1-6 which are unfruitful
and which do not abide in Christ represent the unsaved, unbelievers who only
have a pseudo-faith in Christ? Or can
genuine believers be capable of not abiding in Christ and thus be spiritually
unfruitful? Before any theological or
doctrinal conclusions can be reached, we must first examine carefully what this
passage is saying and what it is not saying.
In the context of John 13-17, the Lord Jesus was preparing His
disciples for spiritual service in an unbelieving, hostile world following His
imminent departure. He would leave His
disciples in this world, but that was no reason for the disciples to abandon
their faith in Him. In the historical
context, Christ was specifically addressing only the eleven, saved, believing
disciples who would form the apostolic foundation of Christ's universal church
(Eph. 2:20) and through whom God would change the world forever by the
preaching of the gospel. Judas
Iscariot, the unsaved, unbelieving disciple had previously departed from their
company (13:30). Consequently, Christ
was not concerned here with testing the genuineness of the salvation of His
eleven remaining disciples; but instead, He instructed them in the new
spiritual relationships they would have with Him, the Holy Spirit, each other,
and the world following His ascension to the Father and the descent of the Holy
Spirit on the day of Pentecost.
Christ's purpose here was to
encourage His disciples through the analogy of a vinedresser nurturing the
branches of a vine. His purpose was not
to admonish the disciples to test the genuineness of their profession and
thereby warn them of possible divine
judgment.
In v1, Christ is the true Vine, and the Father is the
vinedresser. In v2, believers are
represented by branches. While there is
universal agreement among commentators that the fruitful branches represent regenerated believers in Christ, there
is great difference of opinion regarding the identity of the unfruitful branches and the implications
of the Greek word "airei" in v2, translated "He takes away"
(KJV). This word can be translated
variously as either "He takes away," "He lifts up,"
"He picks up," "He carries away," or "He
removes."[3]
Perseverance advocates and Lordship Salvationists
interpret "airei" negatively
as a warning, meaning that God "takes
away" unbelieving professors in eternal judgment. However this passage can also be interpreted
positively as an encouragement to fallen branches that God the Father, as the
heavenly vinedresser, will tenderly care for His vineyard and "lift them
up" to be in a location where they can be exposed to the Sun and have the
potential to be more fruitful. This
interpretation is consistent with the actual viticultural practices of 1st
century vinedressers.[4]
In contrast, the "takes away in judgment" view has several problems. First, it doesn't accord with the flow of the passage. There is a progression in this passage from branches which "bear not fruit" (v2) to branches which "bear fruit" (v2) to branches which "bring forth more fruit" (v2) to branches which "bring forth much fruit" (v5). This progression clearly indicates that it is the Father's objective as our heavenly vinedresser to foster greater growth and productivity, not to stymie potential growth with a fatal act of condemnation. Most plant life in the natural realm actually begins life without fruit, until it has grown sufficiently enough to sustain fruit. It would seem absurd for the Father to "cut off" all branches in His eternal judgment that were not bearing fruit; otherwise few branches in Christ would ever even begin bearing fruit!
Another major problem which the "takes away in judgment" view faces is the actual description of the unfruitful branches in v2. Christ describes them as "Every branch in Me that bears not fruit…" If such unfruitful branches represent unsaved professors whose pseudo-faith is revealed by their unfruitfulness and failure to abide in Christ, then in what sense were these mere professors ever "in Christ," if they were never saved to begin with?! It will not suffice to use the example of Judas Iscariot, as one commentator does,[5] claiming that Judas represents a branch which had "real contact with Jesus" and thus fulfilled Christ's description of a "branch in Me that bears not fruit" (v2). Nor is it convincing to cite similar examples of people who had “…some degree of connection with Jesus, or with the Christian church…"[6]
The prepositional phrase "in Me" is found 16x in the Gospel of John, and it is only used to describe a true spiritual relationship which Christ has with someone, such as the Father or believers. Not once does this phrase refer to someone who merely professed or appeared to be in right spiritual relationship with Christ.[7]
Finally, the "takes away in judgment" view creates a logical conundrum whereby believers are commanded to do what will certainly be true of them anyway. The disciples are commanded by Christ to "Abide in Me" [8] (v4), even though according to the doctrine of the perseverance of the saints, it is already guaranteed that they will abide in Christ since the disciples possessed true, "saving" faith.
However, with the conditional "if" statements in vv6-7, abiding
in Christ is presented as only a possibility,
not a certainty![9] If abiding in fellowship with Jesus Christ
was not guaranteed for the eleven Apostles, then it is certainly not guaranteed
for you and me as Christians today.
But perhaps you're wondering at this point about the
consequence for not abiding in Christ as stated in v6, "If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is
withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are
burned" (KJV). Is this a
reference to judgment in Hell as many commentators assume? Among commentators, there are at least four
different interpretations of this verse.
First, some interpret this to be a reference to judgment
in Hell for believers who lose
their salvation because they
don't abide in Christ.[10] However, this interpretation would
contradict Christ's previous affirmations of eternal security in John 5:24,
6:37, 10:28, as well as the entire doctrine of salvation by grace.
The second view is held by many advocates of the
Calvinistic doctrine of perseverance.[11] This view also interprets burning and fire in
v6 as a reference to judgment in Hell, but instead of a believer losing his or
her salvation, these branches represent those who were never saved in the first place, because they didn't have a
true "saving" faith which is fruitful and enduring.
However, it is unlikely that the reference in v6 to being
"gathered" and "cast into the fire" is a
reference to God's judgment of
unbelievers in Hell. Five observations must be noted from the
actual words and grammar of the passage which argue against this erroneous
interpretation.
First, it is not God who
does the gathering, casting, and burning of unfruitful branches; it is men. [12]
Secondly, the timing of these activities is in the present, not the future,
since all three verbs (gather, cast, burned) are in the present tense.[13] Thirdly, it is technically not people which are said to be gathered for
burning, but branches.[14] Fourthly, if the casting forth of fruitless
branches and their being cast into the fire represents God's eternal judgment
of unbelievers in Hell, then there is no adequate explanation for the process
of withering or drying up also mentioned in v6. The withering occurs after
being cast forth but before being
gathered for the fire. Are proponents
of the "judgment in Hell" view really prepared to accept the
conclusion that God first passes eternal judgment upon fruitless branches in
this lifetime, with the result that this causes them to wither while they are
yet alive upon the earth, and then after they die He casts them into Hell?! This is the required order of events in John
15:6. According to this "judgment
in Hell" view, the reference in v6 to withering as a branch seems
unnecessary and even out of place.
Fifthly, when the term "fire" is used in Scripture as a
reference to eternal judgment in Hell, it is normally accompanied by some
modifying word or words in the immediate context to indicate this, such as
"unquenchable fire," or "everlasting fire,"
or "lake of fire."[15]
For these reasons, the first two interpretations of John
15:6 — the loss of salvation in Hell view and the judgment of unsaved
professors in Hell view — cannot be correct.
A third major view of John 15:6 interprets the phrase
"cast forth" to be a reference to temporal judgment upon a
genuine but disobedient believer as part of God's earthly discipline rather
than as a reference to eternal judgment in Hell. According to this view, God's discipline may lead to a premature physical death, but the child of God will
still enter heaven eternally saved.[16] Others modify this view somewhat, believing
that the branches in v6 are disciplined by God, but not necessarily to the
point of physical death.[17] This view sees the "burning" of v6
as a reference to the burning of believers' works at the judgment seat of
Christ (1 Cor. 3:10-15) in which they will lose potential reward but not their
salvation.
The fourth view, and I believe the correct view, is a
modification of the third view. This
view acknowledges that a genuine believer can be like a branch that is "cast
forth," spiritually "withers," and becomes unfruitful
in the Christian life. However, instead
of viewing the reference to being "burned" in v6 as something
which God does as an act of judgment
upon people (such as causing sickness
or even physical death), it is simply a concluding statement regarding what human vinedressers in the 1st century
were doing with unfruitful, unproductive, useless branches. [18]
Humanly speaking, such branches were no longer good for anything
except to be used as kindling for fire.
This is likely the reason why v6 ends with men, not God, gathering
the unfruitful branches and casting them into the fire. This also explains the consistent use of the
present tense for the verbs gather, cast, and burn, namely that it was a human process presently occurring in
Jesus' day. This also best explains why
in v6 the withering occurs after
being cast forth and yet before being
burned. If v6 was describing God's
eternal judgment of unbelievers in Hell, or even God's temporal chastening of
believers to the point of physical death, then the withering would occur before being cut off and cast forth as a
branch. Finally, this interpretation
also best explains why Christ doesn't actually say that it is people who are cast into the fire but branches. In John 15:6, Christ is not warning "professors" with
pseudo-faith about divine judgment, rather He is cautioning genuine believers
about the possibility of not abiding in fellowship with Him and the consequent
result of becoming spiritually fruitless and useless for the Lord.
What John 15:1-8 is teaching, along with John 8:30-32, is
that we who are genuine believers in Christ may not abide in a relationship of communion
or fellowship with Christ, if we do not walk in daily dependence upon the
Lord. Nevertheless, a believer's union with Christ (v2) is permanent and
eternally secure. But, if we fail to
abide in fellowship with Christ, the result will be unfruitfulness and
spiritual uselessness (vv4-6). Though
it's true that this may be accompanied by divine discipline and loss of
potential reward, as other Scripture passages reveal, that is not the point of
Christ's vine and branch illustration in John 15.
5) …become disqualified in the race of the Christian
life. (1 Corinthians 9:24-27)
"Know ye not that they which
run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may
obtain. And every man that striveth for
the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an
incorruptible. I therefore so run, not
as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: But I keep my body under, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any
means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway." (1 Corinthians 9:24-27)
The
Scriptures reveal that it is possible for a genuinely saved child of God to not
continue in Christ's word as His disciple (John 8:30-32), to not abide in
Christ and be spiritually fruitful (John 15:1-8), and also to become
disqualified in the race of the Christian life.
If
genuine faith always, of necessity, perseveres to the end, then why did Paul in
1 Corinthians 9:24-27 even entertain the notion that he himself, an apostle and
genuine believer, might be a "castaway" (v27)? The underlying Greek term for "castaway"
in the KJV is "adokimos."
This term essentially means "not standing the test"[19]
and hence it is sometimes translated "unapproved" or "disqualified"
or "reprobate" (KJV).
It is sometimes used in reference to the unsaved (Rom. 1:28; 2 Tim. 3:8;
possibly Titus 1:16).
However,
Paul was not concerned here about persevering in order to maintain his
salvation, as Arminians views this passage. [20] Nor was he endeavoring to prove the
genuineness of his salvation, as some Calvinists interpret this passage.[21] He knew he had already received God's gift
of salvation (1 Cor. 1:18); but he didn't know if he would be faithful to the
end of his Christian life as a disciplined witness for Christ, so as to receive
a reward, a "prize" (v24, brabeion), or a "crown"
(v25, stephanon; cf. 1 Cor. 3:10-15; 4:1-5).
Crowns for believers invariably speak of reward for faithful service
rendered to the Lord (2 Tim. 4:8; 1 Pt. 5:4; Rev. 3:11, 4:4, 4:10). They are never
used to describe God's grace-gift of salvation. This passage teaches us that if it was possible for none other
than the Apostle Paul to become "disqualified" or
"reprobate" in the race of the Christian life, then it is also a
possibility for every regenerated soul who does not persevere in the faith and
follow the course God has prescribed.
6)
…resist God's chastening and
correction unto the point of physical death. (1 Cor. 11:30-32)
"For
this cause many are weak and
sickly among you, and many sleep. For
if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we
should not be condemned with the world."
(1 Corinthians 11:30-32)
The Corinthian believers were experiencing physical
chastening from the Lord as a result of their continued, willful
carnality. Earlier in 1 Corinthians 3:2-3 Paul stated that they had a
continual pattern of carnality, and their manner of life made them appear
virtually indistinguishable from the unsaved.
In the immediate context of chapter 11, these Corinthians were making a
mockery of the Lord's Supper in their carnality (vv17-22). They refused to examine their own hearts
before the Lord and confess their sin to Him.
As a result, God had to progressively "ratchet-up" His
discipline upon these disobedient children.
Initially, He caused weakness and sickness among them, and then
eventually "sleep" (v30), which is a New Testament metaphor
for physical death. God was chastening
His disobedient children here for the purpose of restoring them to fellowship
with Himself. When God's efforts at
restoration are met with such persistent resistance, He may call His children
home by an early death; and like a parent to a disobedient child, He may say in
effect, "You're grounded!"
But there is a difference between God's treatment
of disobedient unbelievers and
disobedient believers. Verse 32 indicates that His own children
receive His chastening (paideuo),
while the unsaved children of the world receive condemnation (katakrino).
Yet the Holy Spirit testifies that even these carnal, chastened
Corinthians were genuinely saved (1 Cor. 1:2).
This passage presents a serious dilemma for the
doctrine of the "perseverance of the saints." Obviously, these Corinthians who were
chastened to the point of physical death by the Lord did not persevere in faith
and/or holiness to the end of their lives, and yet they were genuinely saved
from eternal condemnation because of God's grace and the substitutionary work
of Christ. The doctrine of the
"perseverance of the saints" as espoused in Calvinism and Lordship
Salvation has no adequate explanation for the Scriptural teaching that a
genuine believer may commit sin leading to physical death (Acts 5:1-11; 1 Cor.
5:1-5; 1 John 5:16-17; Rev. 2:20-23). g
Part six of this series on perseverance will examine more
N.T. passages which show that a genuine child of God may not necessarily
persevere in faith, though God in His great grace and faithfulness always
perseveres in keeping His saints eternally saved.
Tom Stegall is a graduate of the Grace Institute of Biblical Studies and is the pastor-teacher at Word of Grace Bible Church in Milwaukee, WI.
[1] J. Carl Laney, John:
Moody Gospel Commentary (Moody Press: Chicago, 1992), p. 272.
[2] Ibid, pp. 272-73.
[3] W. Bauer, A
Greek -English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian
Literature, translated by W.F. Arndt and F.W. Gingrich; revised and
augmented by F.W. Danker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), p.
24. The NIV rendering "He cuts
off" is a dynamic interpretation,
not an actual translation of the
word's inherent meaning.
[4] For a detailed explanation of such practices, see
Gary Derickson & Earl Radmacher, The
Disciplemaker (Salem, OR: Charis Press, 2001), pp. 326-29.
[5] D.A. Carson, The
Gospel According to John (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991), p. 515.
[6] Ibid.
[7] See John 6:56; 10:38; 14:10 (2x), 11, 20, 30;
15:2, 4 (2x), 5, 6, 7; 16:33; 17:21, 23.
[8] "Abide" (meinate) in v4 is a verb in the
aorist tense, active voice, and imperative mood; thus it’s a command.
[9] Both v6 & v7 begin with a 3rd class
conditional "if" statement in Greek, meaning here "If you abide
in Me… and you may or may not…"
[10] This view is espoused by Roman Catholics and
Arminians. Robert Sungenis, Not By Faith
Alone: The Biblical Evidence for the Catholic Doctrine of Justification
(Santa Barbara, CA: Queenship Publishing, 1996), p. 278. I. Howard Marshall, Kept by the Power of God: A Study of Perseverance and Falling Away
(Minneapolis: Bethany House, 1969), pp. 183-84. Grant R. Osborne, "Soteriology in the Gospel of John,"
in The Grace of God and the Will of Man,
Clark Pinnock, Gen. Ed. (Minneapolis: Bethany House, 1989), p. 258. Robert
Shank, Life in the Son: A Study of the
Doctrine of Perseverance (Springfield, MO: Westcott Publishers, 1961), pp.
40-47.
[11] D.A. Carson, The
Gospel According to John (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991), p. 517. J. Carl Laney, John: Moody Gospel Commentary (Moody Press: Chicago, 1992) pp.
274-75. John MacArthur, Saved Without A Doubt (Wheaton, IL:
Victor Books), pp. 31-34.
[12] Though technically the word for "men"
doesn't appear in the Greek text, both the verbs "gather"
(sunagousin) and "cast" (ballousin) are plural in number, meaning
that those who do the gathering and casting are plural in number, ie — "they gather them," hence the KJV
rendering, "men gather them." If God were the One judging, these verbs
would be singular, ie — "He
gathers them…" Some have suggested
that the plural is used in reference to God's angels. But the holy angels are entirely foreign to the context of John
15 and the Upper Room Discourse, never being mentioned even once in John 13-17.
[13] This cannot be a reference to holy angels
gathering unsaved humanity to be cast into Hell at the end of either the future
Tribulation (Matt. 13:39-42; 24:31; 25:31-46) or the future Millennial Kingdom
(Rev. 20:11-15), since the verbs in v6 for "gathered"
(sunagousin), "cast" (ballousin), and "burned"
(kaietai) are all present tense
actions, not future tense.
[14] The verse begins with people not abiding, and yet at the end of the verse it is branches that are gathered and
burned. Verse 6 begins with a person,
"If a man abide not in me…."
The word for the one who does not abide in Christ ("a man"
in the KJV) is the Greek pronoun "tis," which is singular in number
and either masculine or feminine in gender.
It is not a neuter pronoun.
However, v6 uses the neuter plural pronoun (auta) to describe the things
that are gathered for burning — "and men gather them
(auta)." The antecedent to the
neuter pronoun "them" is logically the neuter noun "branch"
(to klema). Therefore, technically the
things which are actually said to be gathered for burning are not people but branches. Christ never
actually states that people are burned.
[15] Robert N. Wilkin, Confident in Christ (Irving, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 1999),
p. 106.
[16] Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1993),
Vol. 3, pp. 298-300 and Vol. 7, p. 4.
Joseph Dillow, "Abiding is Remaining in Fellowship: Another Look at
John 15:1-6," Bibliotheca Sacra
Vol. 147 #585 (January-March 1990), pp. 52-53.
[17] Robert N. Wilkin, Confident in Christ (Irving, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 1999),
pp. 107-08.
[18] Gary Derickson & Earl Radmacher, The Disciplemaker (Salem, OR: Charis
Press, 2001), p. 178.
[19] W. Bauer, A
Greek -English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian
Literature, translated by W.F. Arndt and F.W. Gingrich; revised and
augmented by F.W. Danker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), p. 18.
[20] Gordon D. Fee, New
International Commentary on the New Testament: The First Epistle to the
Corinthians (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1987), pp. 242, 440, 459. I. Howard Marshall, Kept by the Power of God: A Study of Perseverance and Falling Away
(Minneapolis: Bethany House, 1969), pp. 120-21. Robert Shank, Life in the Son: A Study of the Doctrine of
Perseverance (Springfield, MO: Westcott Publishers, 1961), p.37.
[21] Charles Hodge, Commentary
on the First Epistle to the Corinthians (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1950,
reprinted 1994), p. 169. Anthony A.
Hoekema, Saved By Grace (Grand
Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1989), p. 255.
Thomas R. Schreiner & Ardel B. Caneday, The Race Set Before Us: A Biblical Theology of Perseverance &
Assurance (Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity Press, 2001), p. 181.